Part of the fun of traveling is learning about other
cultures and lifestyles, getting a peek, however small, into how other people
live, but I find myself uncomfortable with the idea of using modern day poverty
as a tourist attraction.
My initial encounter with this voyeurism was actually in New
York in the seventies. As it was my first visit to the city I took a bus tour which took us past the usual spots such as the Empire
State Building, but it also took us through Harlem.
This was considered one of
the highlights, a chance to get a view of this then notorious area from the
safety of a bus window. Which made me
wonder, why take us there? Were we supposed to feel intrepid because we had
ventured in? Be able to brag, ‘Yeah, I’ve been to Harlem.”?
All I can remember
feeling is that the people on the street could probably do without the busloads
of tourists gawking at them as they went about their daily life. Who wants to feel
as if they are on show or being categorized as a certain type just because of
the neighborhood they live in? Local businesses certainly didn't benefit from the influx. The buses only stopped at red lights.
Back then, tourism was nowhere near such a big business as
it is now and elsewhere most other tours went out of their way to avoid the
poorer areas, showing tourists only the nicer side of the city. Now it seems with the increasing demand for new sights and experiences that poverty can also be a
money earner for tour guides, but what about the people who are unwittingly starring
in these new attractions? Is there really any benefit for them?
With the approach of the World Cup in Brazil, regular news items about the favelas have highlighted this issue. Blogger Loudtravels, who is in Brazil at the moment, links to
a fascinating article on just that subject.
No comments:
Post a Comment